Ad is loading...
FMAIX vs NMAAX
FMAIX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts FMAIX vs NMAAX
Franklin MA Tax-Free Income C
Price$10.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.18M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.97
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.51M
FMAIX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMAIX vs. NMAAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAIX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. FMAIX (332M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than FMAIX: NMAAX (3.28) vs FMAIX (2.40). FMAIX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: FMAIX (30 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). FMAIX (1.28) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.79). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FMAIX (25.42). FMAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMAAX: FMAIX (1000) vs NMAAX (2500). NMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.08 vs. FMAIX (-0.98). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.03 vs. FMAIX (-7.19).
| FMAIX | NMAAX | FMAIX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.79 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 0.79 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.147 | -1.740 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332M | 439M | 76% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 3.28 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.98 | -0.08 | 1,178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.22 | 5.44 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.19 | 1.03 | -696% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.52 | 7.66 | -59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...