FMANF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
SBSW
Price
$3.56
Change
-$0.24 (-6.32%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FMANF vs SBSW

Header iconFMANF vs SBSW Comparison
Open Charts FMANF vs SBSWBanner chart's image
Freeman Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
Sibanye-Stillwater
Price$3.56
Change-$0.24 (-6.32%)
Volume$57.34K
CapitalizationN/A
FMANF vs SBSW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMANF vs. SBSW commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMANF is a Sell and SBSW is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FMANF: $0.06 vs. SBSW: $3.56)
Brand notoriety: FMANF and SBSW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMANF: 6% vs. SBSW: 109%
Market capitalization -- FMANF: $13.92M vs. SBSW: $3.24B
FMANF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.92M. SBSW’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMANF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMANF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBSW is a better buy in the long-term than FMANF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMANF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMANF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SBSW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMANF is a better buy in the short-term than SBSW.

Price Growth

FMANF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -11.28% price change this week, while SBSW (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBSW is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBSW($3.24B) has a higher market cap than FMANF($13.9M). FMANF has higher P/E ratio than SBSW: FMANF (89.29) vs SBSW (4.54). SBSW YTD gains are higher at: -34.438 vs. FMANF (-37.895). SBSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.7B vs. FMANF (-157.85K). SBSW has more cash in the bank: 22.2B vs. FMANF (3.78M). FMANF has less debt than SBSW: FMANF (71.1K) vs SBSW (26B). SBSW has higher revenues than FMANF: SBSW (128B) vs FMANF (0).
FMANFSBSWFMANF / SBSW
Capitalization13.9M3.24B0%
EBITDA-157.85K22.7B-0%
Gain YTD-37.895-34.438110%
P/E Ratio89.294.541,968%
Revenue0128B-
Total Cash3.78M22.2B0%
Total Debt71.1K26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBSW: Fundamental Ratings
SBSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
63
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMANFSBSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMANF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRGTX46.91N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Inv
EVSTX20.95-0.10
-0.48%
Allspring Disciplined US Core C
GAFFX84.83-0.42
-0.49%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F3
IEYYX9.25-0.05
-0.54%
Delaware Climate Solutions Y
GIFFX21.81-0.24
-1.09%
Invesco Growth and Income R6

FMANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMANF and VIORF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMANF and VIORF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMANF
1D Price
Change %
FMANF100%
+0.43%
VIORF - FMANF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.25%
TFPM - FMANF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
SBSW - FMANF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
SMOFF - FMANF
21%
Poorly correlated
-16.76%
KDKCF - FMANF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBSW has been closely correlated with IMPUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBSW jumps, then IMPUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBSW
1D Price
Change %
SBSW100%
-6.32%
IMPUY - SBSW
68%
Closely correlated
-7.89%
ANGPY - SBSW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
PAAS - SBSW
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.14%
MAG - SBSW
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.44%
HL - SBSW
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
More