FMAO
Price
$25.19
Change
-$0.31 (-1.22%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
304.58M
52 days until earnings call
SHFS
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
53.09M
Ad is loading...

FMAO vs SHFS

Header iconFMAO vs SHFS Comparison
Open Charts FMAO vs SHFSBanner chart's image
Farmers & Merchants Ban
Price$25.19
Change-$0.31 (-1.22%)
Volume$21.64K
Capitalization304.58M
SHF Holdings
Price$0.37
Change-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Volume$43.28K
Capitalization53.09M
FMAO vs SHFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FMAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMAO vs. SHFS commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMAO is a Hold and SHFS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FMAO: $25.19 vs. SHFS: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: FMAO and SHFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMAO: 104% vs. SHFS: 20%
Market capitalization -- FMAO: $304.58M vs. SHFS: $53.09M
FMAO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $304.58M. SHFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMAO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMAO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMAO is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMAO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMAO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FMAO is a better buy in the short-term than SHFS.

Price Growth

FMAO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.96% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMAO is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

SHFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAO($305M) has a higher market cap than SHFS($53.1M). FMAO has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: FMAO (12.74) vs SHFS (3.43). FMAO YTD gains are higher at: -14.465 vs. SHFS (-17.655). SHFS has less debt than FMAO: SHFS (15.5M) vs FMAO (300M). FMAO has higher revenues than SHFS: FMAO (94.7M) vs SHFS (-27.72M).
FMAOSHFSFMAO / SHFS
Capitalization305M53.1M574%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.465-17.65582%
P/E Ratio12.743.43371%
Revenue94.7M-27.72M-342%
Total Cash152MN/A-
Total Debt300M15.5M1,935%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMAO: Fundamental Ratings
FMAO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
62
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMAOSHFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FMAO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWIAX12.29-0.08
-0.65%
Westwood Income Opportunity A
BILSX9.55-0.09
-0.93%
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins
VGRIX80.74-1.07
-1.31%
JPMorgan US Value A
DTLVX21.91-0.32
-1.44%
Wilshire Large Company Value Invmt
NWHZX79.24-2.18
-2.68%
Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Gr A

FMAO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAO has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAO jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMAO
1D Price
Change %
FMAO100%
-1.22%
AROW - FMAO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
FCBC - FMAO
68%
Closely correlated
-1.23%
NWBI - FMAO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
EFSC - FMAO
67%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
PFC - FMAO
67%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
More

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and FMAO have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and FMAO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
-2.63%
FMAO - SHFS
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
FLG - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.21%
PBFS - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IFS - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
CLST - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More