Ad is loading...
FMBIX vs RLVSX
FMBIX vs RLVSX Comparison
Open Charts FMBIX vs RLVSX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index
Price$18.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.92M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond S
Price$21.69
Change-$0.06 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.89B
FMBIX vs RLVSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMBIX vs. RLVSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBIX is a Hold and RLVSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLVSX has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. FMBIX (175M). RLVSX pays higher dividends than FMBIX: RLVSX (3.55) vs FMBIX (2.71). FMBIX was incepted earlier than RLVSX: FMBIX (6 years) vs RLVSX (40 years). RLVSX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FMBIX (0.07). RLVSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FMBIX (15.00). FMBIX (0) and RLVSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLVSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.61 vs. FMBIX (2.09). FMBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.83 vs. RLVSX (3.51).
| FMBIX | RLVSX | FMBIX / RLVSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.51 | 14% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.57 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.330 | 0.526 | -63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 5.89B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 2.61 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.03 | 3.69 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.83 | 3.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers