Ad is loading...
FMBIX vs RTEAX
FMBIX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts FMBIX vs RTEAX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index
Price$18.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets185.87M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$22.12
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.95B
FMBIX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMBIX vs. RTEAX commentary
Mar 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBIX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.95B vs. FMBIX (186M). RTEAX pays higher dividends than FMBIX: RTEAX (2.95) vs FMBIX (2.38). FMBIX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: FMBIX (6 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FMBIX (18.00). FMBIX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMBIX (2.94) and RTEAX (2.92) have marching annual gain over last year. FMBIX return over 5 years is better than : -0.11 vs. RTEAX (-3.14).
| FMBIX | RTEAX | FMBIX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.372 | 1.451 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186M | 5.95B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 2.95 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 2.92 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.39 | 1.01 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.11 | -3.14 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 1.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...