Ad is loading...
FMBIX vs RTEAX
FMBIX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts FMBIX vs RTEAX
Fidelity Municipal Bond Index
Price$18.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.92M
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.79
Change-$0.06 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.89B
FMBIX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMBIX vs. RTEAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMBIX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.89B vs. FMBIX (175M). RTEAX pays higher dividends than FMBIX: RTEAX (3.25) vs FMBIX (2.71). FMBIX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: FMBIX (6 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). RTEAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than FMBIX (0.07). RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FMBIX (15.00). FMBIX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FMBIX (2.09) and RTEAX (2.01) have marching annual gain over last year. FMBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.83 vs. RTEAX (2.60).
| FMBIX | RTEAX | FMBIX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.80 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.82 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.330 | 0.174 | -190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 5.89B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 3.25 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.09 | 2.01 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.03 | 2.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.83 | 2.60 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.14 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...