It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FMC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FMC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FMC (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +5.14% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.06%.
FMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
FMC | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMC | WDNA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 12 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 12 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 12 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 12 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 12 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 12 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 12 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago61% | 23 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 12 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago82% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMC has been loosely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FMC jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDNA has been loosely correlated with DNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WDNA jumps, then DNA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
WDNA | 100% | N/A | ||
DNA - WDNA | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.62% | ||
TSVT - WDNA | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
FMC - WDNA | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
EDIT - WDNA | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
ZTS - WDNA | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.59% | ||
More |