FMCC
Price
$8.48
Change
+$0.23 (+2.79%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
287.13M
32 days until earnings call
HYPOF
Price
$214.69
Change
-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMCC vs HYPOF

Header iconFMCC vs HYPOF Comparison
Open Charts FMCC vs HYPOFBanner chart's image
Freddie Mac
Price$8.48
Change+$0.23 (+2.79%)
Volume$3.03M
Capitalization287.13M
Hypoport AG
Price$214.69
Change-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Volume$5
Capitalization1.26B
FMCC vs HYPOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMCC vs. HYPOF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCC is a Buy and HYPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FMCC: $8.37 vs. HYPOF: $214.70)
Brand notoriety: FMCC and HYPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMCC: 39% vs. HYPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FMCC: $287.13M vs. HYPOF: $1.26B
FMCC [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $287.13M. HYPOF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMCC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHYPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMCC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HYPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FMCC is a better buy in the long-term than HYPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMCC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FMCC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FMCC (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +2.45% price change this week, while HYPOF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMCC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.25% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYPOF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than FMCC($287M). HYPOF has higher P/E ratio than FMCC: HYPOF (108.70) vs FMCC (9.40). FMCC YTD gains are higher at: 156.316 vs. HYPOF (-29.552). HYPOF has less debt than FMCC: HYPOF (192M) vs FMCC (3.18T). FMCC has higher revenues than HYPOF: FMCC (20.2B) vs HYPOF (413M).
FMCCHYPOFFMCC / HYPOF
Capitalization287M1.26B23%
EBITDAN/A42.7M-
Gain YTD156.316-29.552-529%
P/E Ratio9.40108.709%
Revenue20.2B413M4,891%
Total CashN/A83.1M-
Total Debt3.18T192M1,653,646%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMCC vs HYPOF: Fundamental Ratings
FMCC
HYPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1439
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
384
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3456
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7023
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HYPOF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FMCC (99). This means that HYPOF’s stock grew similarly to FMCC’s over the last 12 months.

FMCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYPOF (100). This means that FMCC’s stock grew significantly faster than HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCC's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HYPOF (84). This means that FMCC’s stock grew significantly faster than HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FMCC's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (56). This means that FMCC’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

HYPOF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMCC (70). This means that HYPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BDHCX8.760.02
+0.23%
BlackRock Dynamic High Income Inv C
TCMPX17.78N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare International SmallCap N
BRWRX24.71N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq R1
TRWFX24.58N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Equity R4
MGAFF0.20-0.01
-3.59%
Mega Uranium Ltd.

FMCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMCC has been closely correlated with FNMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMCC jumps, then FNMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMCC
1D Price
Change %
FMCC100%
-1.30%
FNMA - FMCC
92%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
OBDC - FMCC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
HYPOF - FMCC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTHY - FMCC
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.57%
MAURY - FMCC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HYPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYPOF and FMCC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYPOF and FMCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPOF
1D Price
Change %
HYPOF100%
N/A
FMCC - HYPOF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
FNMA - HYPOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.51%
MAURY - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNLIF - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCHF - HYPOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More