FMELF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
VMSSF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

FMELF vs VMSSF

Header iconFMELF vs VMSSF Comparison
Open Charts FMELF vs VMSSFBanner chart's image
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85K
CapitalizationN/A
Vortex Metals
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$2.3K
CapitalizationN/A
FMELF vs VMSSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VMSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMELF vs. VMSSF commentary
Dec 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMELF is a Hold and VMSSF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2024
Stock price -- (FMELF: $0.02 vs. VMSSF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FMELF and VMSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMELF: 85% vs. VMSSF: 7%
Market capitalization -- FMELF: $8.53M vs. VMSSF: $4.99M
FMELF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.53M. VMSSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMELF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMELF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMSSF is a better buy in the long-term than FMELF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VMSSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VMSSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FMELF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMSSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +5.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.73% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than VMSSF($4.99M). VMSSF YTD gains are higher at: -30.949 vs. FMELF (-94.286). VMSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
FMELFVMSSFFMELF / VMSSF
Capitalization8.53M4.99M171%
EBITDA-6.65M-2.38M279%
Gain YTD-94.286-30.949305%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.66M-
Total DebtN/A21.2K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMELFVMSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VMSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHSX39.700.16
+0.40%
Hartford Healthcare R4
FMCLX15.660.05
+0.32%
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index R6
TRRSX19.050.02
+0.11%
Nuveen Real Estate Sec Sel Retire
JBALX46.49N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Balanced I
ESCFX13.27N/A
N/A
1290 Essex Small Cap Growth A

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and BTUMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and BTUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
N/A
BTUMF - FMELF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRG - FMELF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
10%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
VMSSF - FMELF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VMSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMSSF and ELMGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMSSF and ELMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMSSF
1D Price
Change %
VMSSF100%
N/A
ELMGF - VMSSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.15%
GSISF - VMSSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RIOFF - VMSSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
RNDXF - VMSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOXR - VMSSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More