FMELF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Capitalization
8.53M
VMSSF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.03 (+75.00%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
4.99M
Ad is loading...

FMELF vs VMSSF

Header iconFMELF vs VMSSF Comparison
Open Charts FMELF vs VMSSFBanner chart's image
FUTURE METALS NL
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$85K
Capitalization8.53M
Vortex Metals
Price$0.07
Change+$0.03 (+75.00%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization4.99M
FMELF vs VMSSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMELF vs. VMSSF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMELF is a Hold and VMSSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FMELF: $0.02 vs. VMSSF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: FMELF and VMSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMELF: 100% vs. VMSSF: 6%
Market capitalization -- FMELF: $8.53M vs. VMSSF: $4.99M
FMELF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.53M. VMSSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMELF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMSSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FMELF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMSSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VMSSF is a better buy in the long-term than FMELF.

Price Growth

FMELF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VMSSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMELF($8.53M) has a higher market cap than VMSSF($4.99M). VMSSF YTD gains are higher at: 44.000 vs. FMELF (0.000). VMSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. FMELF (-6.65M).
FMELFVMSSFFMELF / VMSSF
Capitalization8.53M4.99M171%
EBITDA-6.65M-2.38M279%
Gain YTD0.00044.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A1.66M-
Total DebtN/A21.2K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHARX10.320.03
+0.29%
JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return R2
SBEMX9.48-0.03
-0.32%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Em Mkts Instl
TRZDX80.69-0.97
-1.19%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Z
WVALX53.41-0.95
-1.75%
Weitz Large Cap Equity-Investor Cl
SBPYX39.73-1.41
-3.43%
ClearBridge Small Cap Growth I

FMELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FMELF and BTUMF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FMELF and BTUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMELF
1D Price
Change %
FMELF100%
N/A
BTUMF - FMELF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACRG - FMELF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - FMELF
10%
Poorly correlated
-7.01%
VMSSF - FMELF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGLF - FMELF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
More

VMSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMSSF and ELMGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMSSF and ELMGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMSSF
1D Price
Change %
VMSSF100%
N/A
ELMGF - VMSSF
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.01%
GSISF - VMSSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
RIOFF - VMSSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
RNDXF - VMSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOXR - VMSSF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
More