Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMET vs XLK
FMET vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts FMET vs XLK
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
Price$31.98
Change+$0.34 (+1.07%)
Volume$500
Net Assets33.22M
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$238.35
Change+$2.22 (+0.94%)
Volume$26.56K
Net Assets73.85B
FMET vs XLK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMET vs. XLK commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMET is a StrongBuy and XLK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 73.8B vs. FMET (33.2M). FMET has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: FMET (6.503) vs XLK (1.731). FMET was incepted earlier than XLK: FMET (3 years) vs XLK (26 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FMET (0.40). FMET has a higher turnover XLK (19.00) vs XLK (19.00).
| FMET | XLK | FMET / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 6.503 | 1.731 | 376% |
| Net Assets | 33.2M | 73.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.08 | 500% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 19.00 | 274% |
| Yield | 0.86 | 0.67 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FMET | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 81% | 8 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMET has been closely correlated with MPWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMET jumps, then MPWR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMET | 100% | -0.47% | ||
| MPWR - FMET | 76% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| QCOM - FMET | 67% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SYNA - FMET | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GDS - FMET | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.82% | ||
| PTC - FMET | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 83% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 82% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 81% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| CDNS - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| AMAT - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||