Ad is loading...
FMINX vs NTCCX
FMINX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FMINX vs NTCCX
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc A1
Price$10.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.28M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
FMINX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMINX vs. NTCCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMINX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. FMINX (618M). FMINX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: FMINX (3.20) vs NTCCX (2.75). FMINX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: FMINX (40 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FMINX (0.69). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FMINX (4.25). FMINX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: FMINX (1000) vs NTCCX (2500). FMINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.58 vs. NTCCX (-0.05). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.80 vs. FMINX (-4.85).
| FMINX | NTCCX | FMINX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.59 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.59 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.573 | -1.817 | 87% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 618M | 653M | 95% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 2.75 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | -0.05 | -1,104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.53 | 4.23 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.85 | -0.80 | 608% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.62 | 10.34 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...