Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMINX vs NTCCX
FMINX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FMINX vs NTCCX
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc A1
Price$10.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.48M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
FMINX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMINX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMINX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX (646M) and FMINX (617M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FMINX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: FMINX (3.22) vs NTCCX (2.77). FMINX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: FMINX (40 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FMINX (0.69). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FMINX (4.25). FMINX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: FMINX (1000) vs NTCCX (2500). FMINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.50 vs. NTCCX (-0.52). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.25 vs. FMINX (-6.01).
| FMINX | NTCCX | FMINX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.59 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.59 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.377 | -1.873 | 74% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 617M | 646M | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.77 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.50 | -0.52 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.84 | 4.34 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.01 | -3.25 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.11 | 10.29 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement