Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMKFX vs RGEBX
FMKFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FMKFX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.35
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.02B
FMKFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMKFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMKFX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. FMKFX (352M). FMKFX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FMKFX (0.20) vs RGEBX (0.00). FMKFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FMKFX (6 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FMKFX (0.45). FMKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). FMKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FMKFX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.66 vs. FMKFX (14.98). FMKFX return over 5 years is better than : 67.20 vs. RGEBX (39.33).
| FMKFX | RGEBX | FMKFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 1.09 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.865 | 12.472 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.98 | 17.66 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.98 | 45.03 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.20 | 39.33 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement