Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMNQX vs RMTCX
FMNQX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts FMNQX vs RMTCX
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc A
Price$10.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.74M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.78M
FMNQX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMNQX vs. RMTCX commentary
Jun 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMNQX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMNQX has more cash in the bank: 619M vs. RMTCX (475M). FMNQX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: FMNQX (3.07) vs RMTCX (2.48). FMNQX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: FMNQX (7 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). RMTCX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FMNQX (0.84). RMTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FMNQX (4.25). FMNQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMTCX: FMNQX (1000) vs RMTCX (2000). FMNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.29 vs. RMTCX (-1.79). RMTCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.44 vs. FMNQX (-6.82).
| FMNQX | RMTCX | FMNQX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.708 | -2.647 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 619M | 475M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 2.48 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | -1.79 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.83 | 3.88 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.82 | -6.44 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement