Ad is loading...
FMNQX vs RMTCX
FMNQX vs RMTCX Comparison
Open Charts FMNQX vs RMTCX
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc A
Price$10.86
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets618.29M
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt C
Price$18.93
Change-$0.06 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets474.08M
FMNQX vs RMTCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMNQX vs. RMTCX commentary
May 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMNQX is a Hold and RMTCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMNQX has more cash in the bank: 618M vs. RMTCX (474M). FMNQX pays higher dividends than RMTCX: FMNQX (3.04) vs RMTCX (2.46). FMNQX was incepted earlier than RMTCX: FMNQX (7 years) vs RMTCX (25 years). RMTCX (1.56) is less costly to investors than FMNQX (0.84). RMTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. FMNQX (4.25). FMNQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMTCX: FMNQX (1000) vs RMTCX (2000). FMNQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.80 vs. RMTCX (0.15). RMTCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.38 vs. FMNQX (-4.84).
| FMNQX | RMTCX | FMNQX / RMTCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.56 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.438 | -2.140 | 67% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 618M | 474M | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 2.46 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 0.15 | 525% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.45 | 3.16 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.84 | -3.38 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 4.83 | - |