Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMNZX vs NTCCX
FMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FMNZX vs NTCCX
Franklin MN Tax-Free Inc Adv
Price$10.89
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets617.48M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.45
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
FMNZX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMNZX vs. NTCCX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMNZX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX (646M) and FMNZX (617M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FMNZX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: FMNZX (3.32) vs NTCCX (2.77). FMNZX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: FMNZX (16 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FMNZX (0.59). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. FMNZX (4.25). NTCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMNZX: NTCCX (2500) vs FMNZX (100000). FMNZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.44 vs. NTCCX (-0.51). NTCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.24 vs. FMNZX (-5.67).
| FMNZX | NTCCX | FMNZX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.59 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.59 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.332 | -1.646 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 617M | 646M | 96% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 2.77 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.44 | -0.51 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.06 | 3.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.67 | -3.24 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.43 | 10.74 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement