Ad is loading...
FMOTX vs FXNCX
FMOTX vs FXNCX Comparison
Open Charts FMOTX vs FXNCX
Nuveen MO Municipal Bond A
Price$10.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.95M
Franklin NC Tax-Free Income A1
Price$10.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets574.47M
FMOTX vs FXNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMOTX vs. FXNCX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMOTX is a Hold and FXNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXNCX has more cash in the bank: 574M vs. FMOTX (494M). FMOTX pays higher dividends than FXNCX: FMOTX (3.51) vs FXNCX (2.91). FMOTX was incepted earlier than FXNCX: FMOTX (38 years) vs FXNCX (38 years). FMOTX (0.79) is less costly to investors than FXNCX (0.70). FMOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FXNCX (10.28). FMOTX initial investment is less costly to investors than FXNCX (4%) vs FXNCX (4%). FXNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMOTX: FXNCX (1000) vs FMOTX (2500). FXNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. FMOTX (0.14). FMOTX return over 5 years is better than : 4.01 vs. FXNCX (-3.89).
| FMOTX | FXNCX | FMOTX / FXNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.70 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.744 | -1.751 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 112% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 494M | 574M | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.91 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.14 | 0.23 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.27 | 5.01 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | -3.89 | -103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.55 | -4.69 | -267% |