Ad is loading...
FMUAX vs HBLVX
FMUAX vs HBLVX Comparison
Open Charts FMUAX vs HBLVX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv A
Price$14.31
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
Hartford Balanced Income R6
Price$14.49
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.65B
FMUAX vs HBLVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUAX vs. HBLVX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUAX is a Buy and HBLVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLVX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. FMUAX (1.32B). HBLVX pays higher dividends than FMUAX: HBLVX (3.68) vs FMUAX (2.18). FMUAX was incepted earlier than HBLVX: FMUAX (22 years) vs HBLVX (11 years). FMUAX (1.08) is less costly to investors than HBLVX (0.56). HBLVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FMUAX (23.00). HBLVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUAX: HBLVX (0) vs FMUAX (1500). HBLVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.22 vs. FMUAX (2.21). FMUAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.59 vs. HBLVX (20.07).
| FMUAX | HBLVX | FMUAX / HBLVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.56 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.56 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.551 | 1.720 | -148% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 11.7B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.18 | 3.68 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 3.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.36 | 10.20 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.59 | 20.07 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.33 | 36.38 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers