Ad is loading...
FMUFX vs HBLRX
FMUFX vs HBLRX Comparison
Open Charts FMUFX vs HBLRX
Federated Hermes Muni and Stock Adv F
Price$14.84
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income R3
Price$14.41
Change+$0.05 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FMUFX vs HBLRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMUFX vs. HBLRX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMUFX is a StrongBuy and HBLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLRX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FMUFX (1.39B). HBLRX pays higher dividends than FMUFX: HBLRX (2.97) vs FMUFX (2.33). FMUFX was incepted earlier than HBLRX: FMUFX (18 years) vs HBLRX (15 years). HBLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FMUFX (36.00). HBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FMUFX: HBLRX (0) vs FMUFX (1500). FMUFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.23 vs. HBLRX (2.80). FMUFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.95 vs. HBLRX (6.39).
| FMUFX | HBLRX | FMUFX / HBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.917 | 2.104 | 424% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 12B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 2.97 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.23 | 2.80 | 330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.27 | -2.68 | -271% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.95 | 6.39 | 390% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.16 | 27.36 | 150% |