FNA
Price
$5.48
Change
-$0.02 (-0.36%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:26 AM (EDT)
19 days until earnings call
VRCDF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

FNA vs VRCDF

Header iconFNA vs VRCDF Comparison
Open Charts FNA vs VRCDFBanner chart's image
Paragon 28
Price$5.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.36%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
VERICI DX
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$42.2K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FNA vs VRCDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FNA vs. VRCDF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNA is a Sell and VRCDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FNA: $5.50 vs. VRCDF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: FNA and VRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNA: 46% vs. VRCDF: 468%
Market capitalization -- FNA: $998.19M vs. VRCDF: $22.99M
FNA [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $998.19M. VRCDF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $22.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $7.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRCDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRCDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, VRCDF is a better buy in the long-term than FNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FNA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а +3.19% price change this week, while VRCDF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -22.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNA is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-2.01% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNA($998M) has a higher market cap than VRCDF($23M). VRCDF YTD gains are higher at: -40.909 vs. FNA (-55.752). VRCDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -10.35M vs. FNA (-26.92M). FNA has more cash in the bank: 75.6M vs. VRCDF (15.7M). VRCDF has less debt than FNA: VRCDF (0) vs FNA (110M). FNA has higher revenues than VRCDF: FNA (216M) vs VRCDF (0).
FNAVRCDFFNA / VRCDF
Capitalization998M23M4,339%
EBITDA-26.92M-10.35M260%
Gain YTD-55.752-40.909136%
P/E Ratio370.37N/A-
Revenue216M0-
Total Cash75.6M15.7M482%
Total Debt110M0-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNA has been loosely correlated with KIDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNA jumps, then KIDS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNA
1D Price
Change %
FNA100%
-5.66%
KIDS - FNA
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
SIBN - FNA
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
LUNG - FNA
42%
Loosely correlated
-5.74%
QTRX - FNA
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.12%
TMCI - FNA
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

VRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VRCDF and BITGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VRCDF and BITGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRCDF
1D Price
Change %
VRCDF100%
N/A
BITGF - VRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPCY - VRCDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIO - VRCDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
FNA - VRCDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
TIVC - VRCDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More