Ad is loading...
FNBGX vs RMHSX
FNBGX vs RMHSX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs RMHSX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.88B
Russell Inv Long Duration Bond S
Price$7.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets399.3M
FNBGX vs RMHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. RMHSX (399M). RMHSX pays higher dividends than FNBGX: RMHSX (4.12) vs FNBGX (3.66). FNBGX was incepted earlier than RMHSX: FNBGX (8 years) vs RMHSX (2 years). RMHSX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). RMHSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX (0) and RMHSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNBGX (6.54) and RMHSX (6.51) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FNBGX | RMHSX | FNBGX / RMHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.022 | 4.208 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 399M | 1,224% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 4.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 6.51 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.11 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.21 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |