Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs RMHTX
FNBGX vs RMHTX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs RMHTX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.20
Change-$0.06 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
Russell Inv Long Duration Bond M
Price$7.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.08M
FNBGX vs RMHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.77B vs. RMHTX (403M). RMHTX pays higher dividends than FNBGX: RMHTX (4.18) vs FNBGX (3.87). FNBGX was incepted earlier than RMHTX: FNBGX (8 years) vs RMHTX (2 years). RMHTX (0.54) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). RMHTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX (0) and RMHTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. FNBGX (-1.08).
| FNBGX | RMHTX | FNBGX / RMHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.39 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.54 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.932 | 3.687 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.77B | 403M | 1,185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.87 | 4.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | 2.09 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.69 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.86 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |