Ad is loading...
FNBGX vs RMHYX
FNBGX vs RMHYX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs RMHYX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.88B
Russell Inv Long Duration Bond Y
Price$7.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.44M
FNBGX vs RMHYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. RMHYX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and RMHYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.88B vs. RMHYX (401M). RMHYX pays higher dividends than FNBGX: RMHYX (4.30) vs FNBGX (3.66). FNBGX was incepted earlier than RMHYX: FNBGX (8 years) vs RMHYX (5 years). RMHYX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). RMHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMHYX: FNBGX (0) vs RMHYX (10000000). RMHYX (6.57) and FNBGX (6.54) have marching annual gain over last year. RMHYX return over 5 years is better than : -7.97 vs. FNBGX (-37.21).
| FNBGX | RMHYX | FNBGX / RMHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.022 | 4.253 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.88B | 401M | 1,218% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 4.30 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.54 | 6.57 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.11 | 2.61 | -503% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.21 | -7.97 | 467% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...