Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNBGX vs RMHYX
FNBGX vs RMHYX Comparison
Open Charts FNBGX vs RMHYX
Fidelity Long-Term Trs Bd Index
Price$9.07
Change-$0.02 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.9B
Russell Inv Long Duration Bond Y
Price$7.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets401.13M
FNBGX vs RMHYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNBGX vs. RMHYX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNBGX is a Hold and RMHYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNBGX has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. RMHYX (401M). RMHYX pays higher dividends than FNBGX: RMHYX (4.16) vs FNBGX (3.81). FNBGX was incepted earlier than RMHYX: FNBGX (8 years) vs RMHYX (6 years). RMHYX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FNBGX (0.03). RMHYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNBGX (18.00). FNBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMHYX: FNBGX (0) vs RMHYX (10000000). RMHYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.77 vs. FNBGX (-0.59). RMHYX return over 5 years is better than : -11.64 vs. FNBGX (-40.08).
| FNBGX | RMHYX | FNBGX / RMHYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 9% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.34 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.040 | 3.128 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.9B | 401M | 1,222% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.81 | 4.16 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.59 | 1.77 | -33% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.54 | 1.84 | -791% |
| Returns for 5 years | -40.08 | -11.64 | 344% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers