FNCJF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
15.31M
FQVLF
Price
$17.31
Change
-$0.22 (-1.25%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
20.45B
94 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNCJF vs FQVLF

Header iconFNCJF vs FQVLF Comparison
Open Charts FNCJF vs FQVLFBanner chart's image
Fancamp Exploration
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.77K
Capitalization15.31M
First Quantum Minerals
Price$17.31
Change-$0.22 (-1.25%)
Volume$136.32K
Capitalization20.45B
FNCJF vs FQVLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNCJF vs. FQVLF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCJF is a Hold and FQVLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FNCJF: $0.07 vs. FQVLF: $17.31)
Brand notoriety: FNCJF and FQVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNCJF: 37% vs. FQVLF: 38%
Market capitalization -- FNCJF: $15.31M vs. FQVLF: $20.45B
FNCJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $15.31M. FQVLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $20.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNCJF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFQVLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNCJF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FQVLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNCJF and FQVLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNCJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FQVLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNCJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FQVLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNCJF is a better buy in the short-term than FQVLF.

Price Growth

FNCJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.03% price change this week, while FQVLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNCJF is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

FQVLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQVLF($20.5B) has a higher market cap than FNCJF($15.3M). FQVLF has higher P/E ratio than FNCJF: FQVLF (50.76) vs FNCJF (1.14). FNCJF YTD gains are higher at: 41.700 vs. FQVLF (33.978). FQVLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.32B vs. FNCJF (14.6M). FQVLF has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FNCJF (26.3M). FNCJF has less debt than FQVLF: FNCJF (150K) vs FQVLF (6.74B). FQVLF has higher revenues than FNCJF: FQVLF (6.77B) vs FNCJF (0).
FNCJFFQVLFFNCJF / FQVLF
Capitalization15.3M20.5B0%
EBITDA14.6M2.32B1%
Gain YTD41.70033.978123%
P/E Ratio1.1450.762%
Revenue06.77B-
Total Cash26.3M1.09B2%
Total Debt150K6.74B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNCJF vs FQVLF: Fundamental Ratings
FNCJF
FQVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8654
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8572
SMR RATING
1..100
6988
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9267
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNCJF's Valuation (65) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (66). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (85). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (88). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FNCJF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVLF (42). This means that FNCJF’s stock grew similarly to FQVLF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVLF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as FNCJF (92). This means that FQVLF’s stock grew similarly to FNCJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNCJFFQVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNCJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FQVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGDCF0.11N/A
N/A
Dynasty Gold Corp.
AMBKP8.00N/A
N/A
American Capital Trust I
EKIVY6.60N/A
N/A
Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS
GBNXF17.98-0.06
-0.35%
Gibson Energy, Inc.
ERLFF1.75-0.06
-3.45%
Entree Resources Ltd.

FNCJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNCJF and OMHLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNCJF and OMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNCJF
1D Price
Change %
FNCJF100%
-6.23%
OMHLF - FNCJF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVLF - FNCJF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
FPOCF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
FPRGF - FNCJF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCFF - FNCJF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
More

FQVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FQVLF has been loosely correlated with HBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FQVLF jumps, then HBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVLF
1D Price
Change %
FQVLF100%
-1.25%
HBM - FQVLF
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.47%
CSCCF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
IVPAF - FQVLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
SCCO - FQVLF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
LUNMF - FQVLF
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
More