Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNCMX vs FSKAX
FNCMX vs FSKAX Comparison
Open Charts FNCMX vs FSKAX
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index
Price$248.44
Change+$0.32 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.47B
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$164.19
Change+$0.07 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.88B
FNCMX vs FSKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNCMX vs. FSKAX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNCMX is a StrongBuy and FSKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FNCMX (18.5B). FSKAX pays higher dividends than FNCMX: FSKAX (1.09) vs FNCMX (0.61). FNCMX was incepted earlier than FSKAX: FNCMX (22 years) vs FSKAX (14 years). FNCMX (0.30) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FSKAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 3.00 vs. FNCMX (2.00). FNCMX (0) and FSKAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.73 vs. FNCMX (9.93). FNCMX (104.67) and FSKAX (101.78) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNCMX | FSKAX | FNCMX / FSKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.01 | 1,933% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.01 | 2,000% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.369 | 1.844 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.5B | 106B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.09 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.93 | 10.73 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 85.79 | 67.50 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.67 | 101.78 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 279.79 | 209.24 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement