Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDC vs FYLD
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs FYLD
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$40.86
Change+$0.14 (+0.34%)
Volume$106.19K
Net Assets2.87B
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$28.86
Change+$0.21 (+0.73%)
Volume$20.94K
Net Assets382.07M
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. FYLD commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and FYLD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.87B vs. FYLD (382M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than FYLD: FNDC (19.684) vs FYLD (14.561). FNDC was incepted earlier than FYLD: FNDC (12 years) vs FYLD (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FNDC | FYLD | FNDC / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 19.684 | 14.561 | 135% |
| Net Assets | 2.87B | 382M | 751% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.59 | 66% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 44.00 | 75% |
| Yield | 3.05 | 4.11 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.34% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 72% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.30% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.42% | ||
| MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||