Ad is loading...
FNDC vs FYLD
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison
Open Charts FNDC vs FYLD
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$34.75
Change-$0.40 (-1.14%)
Volume$133.26K
Net Assets2.92B
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
Price$24.41
Change-$0.68 (-2.71%)
Volume$83.54K
Net Assets294.64M
FNDC vs FYLD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDC vs. FYLD commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDC is a Hold and FYLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.92B vs. FYLD (295M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than FYLD: FNDC (1.787) vs FYLD (-3.103). FNDC was incepted earlier than FYLD: FNDC (12 years) vs FYLD (11 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FYLD (0.59). FYLD has a higher turnover FNDC (22.00) vs FNDC (22.00).
| FNDC | FYLD | FNDC / FYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 1.787 | -3.103 | -58% |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 295M | 988% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.59 | 66% |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 44.00 | 50% |
| Yield | 3.40 | 4.35 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDC | FYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 84% | 18 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 73% Closely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.52% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -14.40% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.02% | ||
More | ||||
FYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYLD has been closely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FYLD jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FYLD | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| WDS - FYLD | 73% Closely correlated | -3.28% | ||
| BHP - FYLD | 72% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| SHEL - FYLD | 68% Closely correlated | -6.43% | ||
| CVE - FYLD | 66% Closely correlated | -7.58% | ||
| MT - FYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.52% | ||
More | ||||