Ad is loading...
FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODE
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$33.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
Volume$6.21K
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Multifactor Divers Intl ETF
Price$27.67
Change-$0.36 (-1.28%)
Volume$1.64K
CapitalizationN/A
FNDF vs RODE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODE commentary
Dec 29, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a StrongBuy and RODE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 13.4B vs. RODE (17.9M). RODE has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: RODE (8.937) vs FNDF (2.632). FNDF was incepted earlier than RODE: FNDF (11 years) vs RODE (8 years). RODE has a higher turnover FNDF (15.00) vs FNDF (15.00).
| FNDF | RODE | FNDF / RODE | |
| Gain YTD | 2.632 | 8.937 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 17.9M | 74,860% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 58.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 3.24 | 4.98 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 26 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.54% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.32% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
RODE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODE has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RODE jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODE | 100% | N/A | ||
| WDS - RODE | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SHEL - RODE | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| ML - RODE | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AC - RODE | 16% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| SAN - RODE | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||