Ad is loading...
FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODE
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$35.81
Change+$0.40 (+1.13%)
Volume$9.84K
Net Assets14.23B
Hartford Multifactor Divers Intl ETF
Price$28.43
Change+$0.51 (+1.83%)
Volume$106
Net Assets18.54M
FNDF vs RODE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODE commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 14.2B vs. RODE (18.5M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than RODE: FNDF (6.625) vs RODE (3.224). FNDF was incepted earlier than RODE: FNDF (12 years) vs RODE (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODE (0.29). RODE has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| FNDF | RODE | FNDF / RODE | |
| Gain YTD | 6.625 | 3.224 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 18.5M | 76,757% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 11.00 | 54.00 | 20% |
| Yield | 3.70 | 4.86 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
RODE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODE has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RODE jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODE | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| WDS - RODE | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| SHEL - RODE | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| SAP - RODE | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| GIL - RODE | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| ORI - RODE | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||