Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison
Open Charts FNDF vs RODE
FNDF vs RODE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNDF vs. RODE commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNDF is a Hold and RODE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 16.5B vs. RODE (16.6M). FNDF has a higher annual dividend yield than RODE: FNDF (20.795) vs RODE (2.938). FNDF was incepted earlier than RODE: FNDF (12 years) vs RODE (8 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than RODE (0.29). RODE has a higher turnover FNDF (12.00) vs FNDF (12.00).
| FNDF | RODE | FNDF / RODE | |
| Gain YTD | 20.795 | 2.938 | 708% |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 16.6M | 99,398% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.29 | 86% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 54.00 | 22% |
| Yield | 3.06 | 5.43 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FNDF | RODE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| BHP - FNDF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
RODE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RODE has been loosely correlated with SAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RODE jumps, then SAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RODE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RODE | 100% | N/A | ||
| SAP - RODE | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| WDS - RODE | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| SHEL - RODE | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
| OTEX - RODE | 36% Loosely correlated | -3.57% | ||
| GIL - RODE | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||