Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNGLX vs RHKTX
FNGLX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGLX vs. RHKTX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGLX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. FNGLX (715M). FNGLX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FNGLX (1.50) vs RHKTX (0.99). FNGLX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FNGLX (8 years) vs RHKTX (10 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FNGLX (0.46). FNGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FNGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FNGLX (0) vs RHKTX (250). RHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. FNGLX (9.00). RHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 52.23 vs. FNGLX (46.41).
| FNGLX | RHKTX | FNGLX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.660 | 7.865 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 715M | 16.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.99 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.00 | 11.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.87 | 42.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.41 | 52.23 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement