Ad is loading...
FNGLX vs RHKTX
FNGLX vs RHKTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNGLX vs. RHKTX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNGLX is a Hold and RHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RHKTX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. FNGLX (672M). FNGLX pays higher dividends than RHKTX: FNGLX (1.59) vs RHKTX (1.06). FNGLX was incepted earlier than RHKTX: FNGLX (8 years) vs RHKTX (9 years). RHKTX (0.53) is less costly to investors than FNGLX (0.46). FNGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. RHKTX (5.00). FNGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RHKTX: FNGLX (0) vs RHKTX (250). FNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. RHKTX (6.03). RHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 47.18 vs. FNGLX (43.90).
| FNGLX | RHKTX | FNGLX / RHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.53 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.943 | -1.236 | -76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 672M | 15B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.06 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 6.03 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.27 | 19.95 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.90 | 47.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers