It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FNKO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJOUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FNKO’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JOUT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FNKO (@Recreational Products) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while JOUT (@Recreational Products) price change was +2.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.14%.
FNKO is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
JOUT is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
FNKO | JOUT | FNKO / JOUT | |
Capitalization | 331M | 474M | 70% |
EBITDA | 55.8M | 41.3M | 135% |
Gain YTD | 52.781 | -27.029 | -195% |
P/E Ratio | 10.59 | 26.49 | 40% |
Revenue | 1.1B | 624M | 176% |
Total Cash | 36.5M | 110M | 33% |
Total Debt | 362M | 53.5M | 677% |
FNKO | JOUT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FNKO's Valuation (63) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as JOUT (95). This means that FNKO’s stock grew similarly to JOUT’s over the last 12 months.
FNKO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as JOUT (100). This means that FNKO’s stock grew similarly to JOUT’s over the last 12 months.
JOUT's SMR Rating (89) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as FNKO (92). This means that JOUT’s stock grew similarly to FNKO’s over the last 12 months.
FNKO's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as JOUT (50). This means that FNKO’s stock grew similarly to JOUT’s over the last 12 months.
JOUT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNKO (91). This means that JOUT’s stock grew significantly faster than FNKO’s over the last 12 months.
FNKO | JOUT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago81% | 6 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 16 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago89% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FNKO and CLAR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNKO and CLAR's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNKO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FNKO | 100% | +1.37% | ||
CLAR - FNKO | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
MAT - FNKO | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.11% | ||
JOUT - FNKO | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
THO - FNKO | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
LCII - FNKO | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JOUT has been loosely correlated with BC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JOUT jumps, then BC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JOUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
JOUT | 100% | +1.32% | ||
BC - JOUT | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
LCII - JOUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
MCFT - JOUT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
WGO - JOUT | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
PII - JOUT | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
More |