FNLIF
Price
$27.63
Change
+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
MAMTF
Price
$14.36
Change
+$0.47 (+3.38%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
423.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLIF vs MAMTF

Header iconFNLIF vs MAMTF Comparison
Open Charts FNLIF vs MAMTFBanner chart's image
First National Financial
Price$27.63
Change+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization1.65B
Mcan Mortgage
Price$14.36
Change+$0.47 (+3.38%)
Volume$200
Capitalization423.26M
FNLIF vs MAMTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLIF vs. MAMTF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLIF is a Hold and MAMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLIF: $27.63 vs. MAMTF: $14.36)
Brand notoriety: FNLIF and MAMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLIF: 163% vs. MAMTF: 47%
Market capitalization -- FNLIF: $1.65B vs. MAMTF: $423.26M
FNLIF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.65B. MAMTF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $423.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMAMTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MAMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAMTF is a better buy in the long-term than FNLIF.

Price Growth

FNLIF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MAMTF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.10% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLIF($1.65B) has a higher market cap than MAMTF($423M). FNLIF has higher P/E ratio than MAMTF: FNLIF (12.33) vs MAMTF (8.47). MAMTF YTD gains are higher at: 6.292 vs. FNLIF (-1.401). MAMTF has more cash in the bank: 816M vs. FNLIF (631M). MAMTF has less debt than FNLIF: MAMTF (31.8M) vs FNLIF (38.8B). FNLIF has higher revenues than MAMTF: FNLIF (504M) vs MAMTF (101M).
FNLIFMAMTFFNLIF / MAMTF
Capitalization1.65B423M389%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.4016.292-22%
P/E Ratio12.338.47146%
Revenue504M101M499%
Total Cash631M816M77%
Total Debt38.8B31.8M122,013%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLIF vs MAMTF: Fundamental Ratings
FNLIF
MAMTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3246
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6837
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MAMTF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLIF (15). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLIF (68). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLIF (100). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLIF (59). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

MAMTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLIF (100). This means that MAMTF’s stock grew similarly to FNLIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCVCX23.09N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cp Val Insghts C
WSTRX46.89N/A
N/A
Macquarie Science and Technology R
MGFZX10.00N/A
N/A
MassMutual Global I
PGHAX60.78N/A
N/A
Putnam Global Health Care R6
CUSRX12.04N/A
N/A
Cullen Small Cap Value Retail

FNLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNLIF and FCRM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNLIF and FCRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLIF
1D Price
Change %
FNLIF100%
N/A
FCRM - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WU - FNLIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSTS - FNLIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
FNMA - FNLIF
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
FMCC - FNLIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More

MAMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MAMTF and ZIZTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MAMTF and ZIZTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAMTF
1D Price
Change %
MAMTF100%
N/A
ZIZTF - MAMTF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGTHY - MAMTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-14.06%
FNLIF - MAMTF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCHF - MAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZRFY - MAMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
More