FNLIF
Price
$27.63
Change
+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
1.65B
VSTS
Price
$6.20
Change
-$0.10 (-1.59%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.53B
18 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLIF vs VSTS

Header iconFNLIF vs VSTS Comparison
Open Charts FNLIF vs VSTSBanner chart's image
First National Financial
Price$27.63
Change+$0.29 (+1.06%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization1.65B
Vestis
Price$6.20
Change-$0.10 (-1.59%)
Volume$2M
Capitalization2.53B
FNLIF vs VSTS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLIF vs. VSTS commentary
Jul 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLIF is a Buy and VSTS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLIF: $27.63 vs. VSTS: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: FNLIF and VSTS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLIF: 111% vs. VSTS: 68%
Market capitalization -- FNLIF: $1.65B vs. VSTS: $2.53B
FNLIF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.65B. VSTS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $2.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLIF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVSTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLIF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • VSTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLIF is a better buy in the long-term than VSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLIF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VSTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • VSTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNLIF is a better buy in the short-term than VSTS.

Price Growth

FNLIF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VSTS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

VSTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.93% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTS($2.53B) has a higher market cap than FNLIF($1.65B). VSTS has higher P/E ratio than FNLIF: VSTS (13.09) vs FNLIF (12.33). FNLIF YTD gains are higher at: -1.401 vs. VSTS (-58.554). FNLIF has more cash in the bank: 631M vs. VSTS (48.9M). VSTS has less debt than FNLIF: VSTS (1.68B) vs FNLIF (38.8B). VSTS has higher revenues than FNLIF: VSTS (2.84B) vs FNLIF (504M).
FNLIFVSTSFNLIF / VSTS
Capitalization1.65B2.53B65%
EBITDAN/A411M-
Gain YTD-1.401-58.5542%
P/E Ratio12.3313.0994%
Revenue504M2.84B18%
Total Cash631M48.9M1,290%
Total Debt38.8B1.68B2,307%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLIF: Fundamental Ratings
FNLIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
15
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLIFVSTS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VSTS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACEAX9.360.08
+0.86%
AB All China Equity A
BGIVX16.010.12
+0.73%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 5
GIXIX10.110.05
+0.50%
Nationwide International Index R6
PJRAX9.080.03
+0.33%
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A
DISVX27.650.05
+0.18%
DFA International Small Cap Value I

FNLIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNLIF and FCRM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNLIF and FCRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLIF
1D Price
Change %
FNLIF100%
N/A
FCRM - FNLIF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WU - FNLIF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
VSTS - FNLIF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
FNMA - FNLIF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
FMCC - FNLIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
More

VSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VSTS has been loosely correlated with PMTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VSTS jumps, then PMTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VSTS
1D Price
Change %
VSTS100%
+5.00%
PMTS - VSTS
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
R - VSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
AXP - VSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
ENVA - VSTS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
OMF - VSTS
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
More