FNLPF
Price
$18.05
Change
+$0.77 (+4.46%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
60 days until earnings call
GLGDF
Price
$1.69
Change
+$0.07 (+4.32%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLPF vs GLGDF

Header iconFNLPF vs GLGDF Comparison
Open Charts FNLPF vs GLGDFBanner chart's image
Fresnillo
Price$18.05
Change+$0.77 (+4.46%)
Volume$23.14K
Capitalization5.86B
GoGold Resources
Price$1.69
Change+$0.07 (+4.32%)
Volume$459.41K
Capitalization298.17M
FNLPF vs GLGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLPF vs. GLGDF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLPF is a Buy and GLGDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLPF: $18.05 vs. GLGDF: $1.69)
Brand notoriety: FNLPF and GLGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLPF: 190% vs. GLGDF: 222%
Market capitalization -- FNLPF: $5.86B vs. GLGDF: $298.17M
FNLPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86B. GLGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $298.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGLGDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the long-term than GLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLGDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than FNLPF.

Price Growth

FNLPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.39% price change this week, while GLGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +23.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +47.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLPF($5.86B) has a higher market cap than GLGDF($298M). GLGDF has higher P/E ratio than FNLPF: GLGDF (769.23) vs FNLPF (25.19). FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 141.382 vs. GLGDF (120.915). FNLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. FNLPF (2.56M). GLGDF has less debt than FNLPF: GLGDF (778K) vs FNLPF (1.27B). FNLPF has higher revenues than GLGDF: FNLPF (2.43B) vs GLGDF (28.6M).
FNLPFGLGDFFNLPF / GLGDF
Capitalization5.86B298M1,965%
EBITDA829M-3.76M-22,060%
Gain YTD141.382120.915117%
P/E Ratio25.19769.233%
Revenue2.43B28.6M8,507%
Total Cash2.56M88.8M3%
Total Debt1.27B778K162,982%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLPF vs GLGDF: Fundamental Ratings
FNLPF
GLGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3960
SMR RATING
1..100
9288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
348
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLPF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLGDF (90). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (60). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FNLPF (92). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to FNLPF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (36). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (48). This means that FNLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLPFGLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRNA85.451.47
+1.75%
Verona Pharma plc
REFR2.020.02
+1.00%
Research Frontiers
NOW1017.604.86
+0.48%
SERVICENOW
HURN142.16-2.72
-1.88%
Huron Consulting Group
SMR31.05-0.74
-2.33%
NuScale Power Corp

FNLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLPF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLPF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLPF
1D Price
Change %
FNLPF100%
+4.46%
PAAS - FNLPF
50%
Loosely correlated
+7.56%
HL - FNLPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+5.56%
AU - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
MAG - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+5.16%
GLGDF - FNLPF
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.32%
More

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
+4.32%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
+7.56%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.16%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.56%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.60%
EXK - GLGDF
55%
Loosely correlated
+7.57%
More