FNLPF
Price
$16.93
Change
+$1.28 (+8.18%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
62 days until earnings call
HL
Price
$5.78
Change
+$0.15 (+2.66%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.01B
58 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLPF vs HL

Header iconFNLPF vs HL Comparison
Open Charts FNLPF vs HLBanner chart's image
Fresnillo
Price$16.93
Change+$1.28 (+8.18%)
Volume$16.17K
Capitalization5.86B
Hecla Mining
Price$5.78
Change+$0.15 (+2.66%)
Volume$191.01K
Capitalization3.01B
FNLPF vs HL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLPF vs. HL commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLPF is a Buy and HL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLPF: $17.00 vs. HL: $5.63)
Brand notoriety: FNLPF: Not notable vs. HL: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLPF: 60% vs. HL: 133%
Market capitalization -- FNLPF: $5.86B vs. HL: $3.01B
FNLPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86B. HL’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the long-term than HL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than FNLPF.

Price Growth

FNLPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.83% price change this week, while HL (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

HL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLPF($5.86B) has a higher market cap than HL($3.01B). HL has higher P/E ratio than FNLPF: HL (1111.11) vs FNLPF (25.19). FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 127.340 vs. HL (14.829). FNLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. HL (124M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. FNLPF (2.56M). HL has less debt than FNLPF: HL (663M) vs FNLPF (1.27B). FNLPF has higher revenues than HL: FNLPF (2.43B) vs HL (720M).
FNLPFHLFNLPF / HL
Capitalization5.86B3.01B195%
EBITDA829M124M669%
Gain YTD127.34014.829859%
P/E Ratio25.191111.112%
Revenue2.43B720M338%
Total Cash2.56M106M2%
Total Debt1.27B663M191%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLPF vs HL: Fundamental Ratings
FNLPF
HL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1413
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4359
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNLPF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (42) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (59) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (61) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HL (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to HL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLPFHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THGCX25.290.14
+0.56%
Thornburg International Equity C
LICQX16.81N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity R2
IFAFX26.00N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F1
IGMSX8.26N/A
N/A
Voya Global Insights Portfolio S
NDGAX22.72N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A