FNLPF
Price
$19.37
Change
+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.86B
40 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$28.86
Change
+$0.18 (+0.63%)
Updated
Jun 26, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNLPF vs PAAS

Header iconFNLPF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts FNLPF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Fresnillo
Price$19.37
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Volume$5.66K
Capitalization5.86B
Pan American Silver
Price$28.86
Change+$0.18 (+0.63%)
Volume$1.15K
Capitalization5.59B
FNLPF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNLPF vs. PAAS commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNLPF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FNLPF: $19.37 vs. PAAS: $28.68)
Brand notoriety: FNLPF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNLPF: 107% vs. PAAS: 53%
Market capitalization -- FNLPF: $5.86B vs. PAAS: $5.59B
FNLPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.86B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNLPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNLPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNLPF is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNLPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNLPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than FNLPF.

Price Growth

FNLPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.62%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNLPF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNLPF($5.86B) and PAAS($5.59B) have the same market capitalization . FNLPF YTD gains are higher at: 159.034 vs. PAAS (43.055). FNLPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 829M vs. PAAS (296M). FNLPF has higher revenues than PAAS: FNLPF (2.43B) vs PAAS (2.02B).
FNLPFPAASFNLPF / PAAS
Capitalization5.86B5.59B105%
EBITDA829M296M280%
Gain YTD159.03443.055369%
P/E Ratio25.19N/A-
Revenue2.43B2.02B120%
Total Cash2.56MN/A-
Total Debt1.27BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNLPF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
FNLPF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8624
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3989
SMR RATING
1..100
9180
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNLPF (17) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to FNLPF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (89) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNLPF (91) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to FNLPF’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (40) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

FNLPF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that FNLPF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNLPFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNLPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAR32.890.11
+0.34%
GraniteShares Gold Trust
WGMI19.480.06
+0.31%
CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF
BBCB45.42N/A
+0.01%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders $ InvmGrdCorpBdETF
ESPO107.32-0.30
-0.28%
VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF
DFAT52.99-0.49
-0.92%
Dimensional US Targeted Value ETF

FNLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLPF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNLPF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNLPF
1D Price
Change %
FNLPF100%
+0.46%
PAAS - FNLPF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
HL - FNLPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
AU - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
MAG - FNLPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
GLGDF - FNLPF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
+1.02%
AEM - PAAS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
WPM - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
AGI - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
MAG - PAAS
77%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
CDE - PAAS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More