FNMA
Price
$8.52
Change
-$0.26 (-2.96%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
510.72M
17 days until earnings call
KGTHY
Price
$8.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.58%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNMA vs KGTHY

Header iconFNMA vs KGTHY Comparison
Open Charts FNMA vs KGTHYBanner chart's image
Fannie Mae
Price$8.52
Change-$0.26 (-2.96%)
Volume$4.77M
Capitalization510.72M
Krungthai Card Public
Price$8.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.58%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.54B
FNMA vs KGTHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGTHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNMA vs. KGTHY commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNMA is a Hold and KGTHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FNMA: $8.78 vs. KGTHY: $8.65)
Brand notoriety: FNMA and KGTHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNMA: 39% vs. KGTHY: 7%
Market capitalization -- FNMA: $510.72M vs. KGTHY: $3.54B
FNMA [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $510.72M. KGTHY’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNMA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileKGTHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNMA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • KGTHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNMA is a better buy in the long-term than KGTHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNMA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGTHY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNMA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGTHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGTHY is a better buy in the short-term than FNMA.

Price Growth

FNMA (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while KGTHY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -19.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNMA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.93% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGTHY($3.54B) has a higher market cap than FNMA($511M). FNMA has higher P/E ratio than KGTHY: FNMA (833.33) vs KGTHY (16.69). FNMA YTD gains are higher at: 167.683 vs. KGTHY (-28.163). KGTHY has less debt than FNMA: KGTHY (59.5B) vs FNMA (4.23T). FNMA has higher revenues than KGTHY: FNMA (29.8B) vs KGTHY (19.1B).
FNMAKGTHYFNMA / KGTHY
Capitalization511M3.54B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD167.683-28.163-595%
P/E Ratio833.3316.694,992%
Revenue29.8B19.1B156%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.23T59.5B7,111%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNMA: Fundamental Ratings
FNMA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
58
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15
SMR RATING
1..100
2
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNMAKGTHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNMA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGTHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVWX29.100.44
+1.54%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value R6
JGRQX17.650.23
+1.32%
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth R3
KLGIX56.030.33
+0.59%
NYLI WMC Growth Class I
VDIGX36.220.07
+0.19%
Vanguard Dividend Growth Inv
BIGUX31.420.01
+0.03%
Baron International Growth R6

FNMA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNMA has been closely correlated with FMCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNMA jumps, then FMCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNMA
1D Price
Change %
FNMA100%
-3.52%
FMCC - FNMA
92%
Closely correlated
-2.40%
SOFI - FNMA
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.27%
ATLC - FNMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
OBDC - FNMA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
HRI - FNMA
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
More

KGTHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KGTHY and FNMA have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KGTHY and FNMA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGTHY
1D Price
Change %
KGTHY100%
+0.64%
FNMA - KGTHY
10%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
FMCC - KGTHY
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
LZRFY - KGTHY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
FNLIF - KGTHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMTF - KGTHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More