Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs LSAGX
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSAGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$58.70
Change+$4.29 (+7.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.54B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth A
Price$19.37
Change+$1.81 (+10.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets94.44M
FNPFX vs LSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSAGX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. LSAGX (94.4M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSAGX: FNPFX (0.90) vs LSAGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSAGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSAGX (9 years). LSAGX (1.38) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSAGX (6.00). LSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSAGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.06 vs. FNPFX (-9.42). FNPFX (37.25) and LSAGX (35.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | LSAGX | FNPFX / LSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.21 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.38 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.383 | -14.591 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123B | 94.4M | 130,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.42 | -2.06 | 456% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.21 | 10.30 | -51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.25 | 35.49 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers