Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs LSCGX
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$59.20
Change-$2.45 (-3.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.04B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$17.86
Change-$0.88 (-4.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.14M
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and LSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LSCGX (108M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: FNPFX (0.90) vs LSCGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.14) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). LSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSCGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. FNPFX (2.70). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 70.87 vs. LSCGX (60.58).
| FNPFX | LSCGX | FNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.96 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.14 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.725 | -2.396 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 108M | 128,704% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.70 | 11.28 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.22 | 16.18 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.87 | 60.58 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers