Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSCGX
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSCGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$69.64
Change+$0.46 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.97B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$21.47
Change+$0.21 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.76M
FNPFX vs LSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSCGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. LSCGX (129M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: FNPFX (0.82) vs LSCGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSCGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSCGX (9 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). LSCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSCGX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.41 vs. FNPFX (12.09). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 52.75 vs. LSCGX (44.09).
| FNPFX | LSCGX | FNPFX / LSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.95 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.13 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.142 | 11.823 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 129M | 119,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 22.41 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 69.46 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.75 | 44.09 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement