Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSGGX
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$70.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.49B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$23.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.32M
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSGGX (132M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: FNPFX (0.79) vs LSGGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). LSGGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSGGX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.61 vs. FNPFX (12.06). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.04 vs. FNPFX (42.55).
| FNPFX | LSGGX | FNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.430 | 13.235 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 132M | 118,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 24.61 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.66 | 73.50 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.55 | 45.04 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement