Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs LSGGX
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$69.64
Change+$0.46 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.97B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$23.52
Change+$0.23 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.76M
FNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. LSGGX (129M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: FNPFX (0.82) vs LSGGX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: FNPFX (8 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). LSGGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: LSGGX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.66 vs. FNPFX (12.09). LSGGX (52.93) and FNPFX (52.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | LSGGX | FNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.95 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.13 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.142 | 12.375 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 154B | 129M | 119,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.09 | 23.66 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.92 | 75.26 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.75 | 52.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement