Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs MECVX
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MECVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$63.98
Change+$1.43 (+2.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.44B
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Investor Class
Price$14.71
Change+$0.26 (+1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.59M
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MECVX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MECVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. MECVX (169M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MECVX: FNPFX (0.88) vs MECVX (0.11). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MECVX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MECVX (9 years). MECVX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MECVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MECVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MECVX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.39 vs. MECVX (3.48). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 56.14 vs. MECVX (23.81).
| FNPFX | MECVX | FNPFX / MECVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.027 | 0.273 | 1,110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 140B | 169M | 82,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.11 | 827% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.39 | 3.48 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.76 | 35.63 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.14 | 23.81 | 236% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...