Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MECVX
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MECVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.74
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
NYLI Epoch Capital Growth Investor Class
Price$15.21
Change+$0.10 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.22M
FNPFX vs MECVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MECVX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MECVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. MECVX (148M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MECVX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MECVX (0.10). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MECVX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MECVX (9 years). MECVX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MECVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MECVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MECVX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. MECVX (1.10). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.57 vs. MECVX (11.56).
| FNPFX | MECVX | FNPFX / MECVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.41 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.082 | 3.681 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 148M | 101,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.10 | 800% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | 1.10 | 884% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.75 | 38.58 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.57 | 11.56 | 394% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement