Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs MGLBX
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$58.60
Change+$0.30 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.19B
Marsico Global
Price$24.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.48M
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. MGLBX (336M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: FNPFX (0.90) vs MGLBX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MGLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MGLBX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. FNPFX (1.46). MGLBX (42.45) and FNPFX (41.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | MGLBX | FNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.636 | -4.887 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 336M | 38,988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.46 | 9.89 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.67 | 39.59 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.66 | 42.45 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.33 | - |