Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs MGLBX
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$67.21
Change+$0.52 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.9B
Marsico Global
Price$29.12
Change+$0.29 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets403.51M
FNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. MGLBX (404M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: FNPFX (0.82) vs MGLBX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: FNPFX (8 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). MGLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: MGLBX (2500) vs FNPFX (1000000). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.24 vs. FNPFX (10.98). MGLBX (47.77) and FNPFX (46.05) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNPFX | MGLBX | FNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.44 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.229 | 12.705 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 149B | 404M | 36,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.98 | 25.24 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.08 | 82.58 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.05 | 47.77 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.05 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement