Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs RGCEX
FNPFX vs RGCEX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs RGCEX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$63.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.07B
Columbia Select Global Equity C
Price$15.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.98M
FNPFX vs RGCEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. RGCEX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and RGCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. RGCEX (700M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than RGCEX: FNPFX (0.88) vs RGCEX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than RGCEX: FNPFX (8 years) vs RGCEX (25 years). RGCEX (1.99) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FNPFX (24.00). RGCEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: RGCEX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.73 vs. RGCEX (-1.17). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.51 vs. RGCEX (19.97).
| FNPFX | RGCEX | FNPFX / RGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.97 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.99 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.415 | 1.328 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 700M | 20,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.73 | -1.17 | -491% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.52 | 25.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.51 | 19.97 | 243% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.51 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...