Ad is loading...
FNPFX vs SCGVX
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs SCGVX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$61.68
Change+$0.52 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.68B
Sands Capital Global Growth I
Price$29.09
Change+$0.26 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FNPFX vs SCGVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. SCGVX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Buy and SCGVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. SCGVX (1.1B). FNPFX pays higher dividends than SCGVX: FNPFX (0.90) vs SCGVX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than SCGVX: FNPFX (8 years) vs SCGVX (15 years). SCGVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. SCGVX (17.00). SCGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: SCGVX (100000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.03 vs. SCGVX (0.76). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.60 vs. SCGVX (13.15).
| FNPFX | SCGVX | FNPFX / SCGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.22 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.676 | -0.615 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 1.1B | 12,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 0.76 | 791% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.64 | 14.75 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.60 | 13.15 | 385% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.45 | - |