Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNPFX vs WAGSX
FNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison
Open Charts FNPFX vs WAGSX
American Funds New Perspective F3
Price$71.46
Change-$0.36 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.04B
Wasatch Global Select Investor
Price$12.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.91M
FNPFX vs WAGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNPFX vs. WAGSX commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNPFX is a Hold and WAGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. WAGSX (12.9M). FNPFX pays higher dividends than WAGSX: FNPFX (0.78) vs WAGSX (0.00). FNPFX was incepted earlier than WAGSX: FNPFX (9 years) vs WAGSX (6 years). WAGSX (2.57) is less costly to investors than FNPFX (0.41). FNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. WAGSX (21.00). WAGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNPFX: WAGSX (2000) vs FNPFX (1000000). FNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. WAGSX (5.54). FNPFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.75 vs. WAGSX (1.92).
| FNPFX | WAGSX | FNPFX / WAGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.36 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 2.57 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.072 | 5.717 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 12.9M | 1,232,558% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.26 | 5.54 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.07 | 24.37 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.75 | 1.92 | 1,917% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement