Ad is loading...
FNSDX vs RBEMX
FNSDX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSDX vs. RBEMX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSDX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX has more cash in the bank: 24.1B vs. FNSDX (11.4B). FNSDX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: FNSDX (1.48) vs RBEMX (0.50). FNSDX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: FNSDX (8 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FNSDX (0.65). FNSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBEMX (5.00). FNSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEMX: FNSDX (0) vs RBEMX (250). FNSDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. RBEMX (5.71). FNSDX (45.79) and RBEMX (43.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNSDX | RBEMX | FNSDX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.916 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 24.1B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.50 | 298% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | 5.71 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.02 | 15.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.79 | 43.58 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 55.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers