Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSDX vs RBEMX
FNSDX vs RBEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSDX vs. RBEMX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSDX is a Hold and RBEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. FNSDX (12.2B). FNSDX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: FNSDX (1.40) vs RBEMX (0.47). FNSDX was incepted earlier than RBEMX: FNSDX (8 years) vs RBEMX (11 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than FNSDX (0.65). FNSDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. RBEMX (5.00). FNSDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEMX: FNSDX (0) vs RBEMX (250). RBEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.23 vs. FNSDX (11.55). RBEMX (48.40) and FNSDX (47.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FNSDX | RBEMX | FNSDX / RBEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 9.777 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 27.1B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.40 | 0.47 | 299% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.55 | 12.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.11 | 39.68 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.71 | 48.40 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement