Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs NSFMX
FNSFX vs NSFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. NSFMX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and NSFMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 6.92B vs. NSFMX (6.02M). FNSFX (1.33) and NSFMX (1.28) have matching dividends . FNSFX was incepted earlier than NSFMX: FNSFX (8 years) vs NSFMX (8 years). NSFMX (1.62) is less costly to investors than FNSFX (0.65). NSFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FNSFX (18.00). FNSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFMX: FNSFX (0) vs NSFMX (1000000). FNSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.55 vs. NSFMX (-38.29). FNSFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. NSFMX (-28.29).
| FNSFX | NSFMX | FNSFX / NSFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.49 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.62 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.525 | -39.418 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.92B | 6.02M | 114,881% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.28 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.55 | -38.29 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.49 | -22.31 | -222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.24 | -28.29 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement