Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs PRBAX
FNSFX vs PRBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. PRBAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and PRBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 7.04B vs. PRBAX (211M). PRBAX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: PRBAX (1.90) vs FNSFX (1.32). FNSFX was incepted earlier than PRBAX: FNSFX (8 years) vs PRBAX (6 years). FNSFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than PRBAX (0.61). FNSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRBAX (12.00). FNSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRBAX: FNSFX (0) vs PRBAX (1000). PRBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. FNSFX (13.79). PRBAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.80 vs. FNSFX (42.30).
| FNSFX | PRBAX | FNSFX / PRBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.60 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.61 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.389 | 13.837 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 211M | 3,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.90 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 15.45 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.31 | 48.56 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.30 | 58.80 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers