Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNSFX vs PRBMX
FNSFX vs PRBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNSFX vs. PRBMX commentary
Aug 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNSFX is a Hold and PRBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNSFX has more cash in the bank: 7.04B vs. PRBMX (214M). PRBMX pays higher dividends than FNSFX: PRBMX (2.26) vs FNSFX (1.32). FNSFX was incepted earlier than PRBMX: FNSFX (8 years) vs PRBMX (6 years). FNSFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than PRBMX (0.16). FNSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRBMX (12.00). FNSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRBMX: FNSFX (0) vs PRBMX (1000000). PRBMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.76 vs. FNSFX (12.12). PRBMX return over 5 years is better than : 60.26 vs. FNSFX (41.11).
| FNSFX | PRBMX | FNSFX / PRBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.15 | 433% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.16 | 406% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.903 | 9.368 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 214M | 3,287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 2.26 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 13.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.85 | 44.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.11 | 60.26 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers