Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs MDXBX
FNTAX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs MDXBX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.41
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.38M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.71
Change-$0.03 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FNTAX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FNTAX (70.4M). MDXBX pays higher dividends than FNTAX: MDXBX (3.46) vs FNTAX (3.17). FNTAX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FNTAX (24 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). FNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. MDXBX (17.30). FNTAX (2500) and MDXBX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.45 vs. FNTAX (-1.05). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 1.85 vs. FNTAX (-5.29).
| FNTAX | MDXBX | FNTAX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.49 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.53 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.811 | -1.699 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 2.27B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.46 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.05 | -0.45 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.35 | 5.98 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.29 | 1.85 | -286% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.33 | 12.89 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement