Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs PRVAX
FNTAX vs PRVAX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs PRVAX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.38M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond
Price$10.71
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FNTAX vs PRVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. PRVAX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and PRVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRVAX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. FNTAX (70.4M). PRVAX pays higher dividends than FNTAX: PRVAX (3.35) vs FNTAX (3.17). FNTAX was incepted earlier than PRVAX: FNTAX (24 years) vs PRVAX (34 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than PRVAX (0.55). FNTAX (20.00) and PRVAX (19.10) have comparable annual turnover. FNTAX (2500) and PRVAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FNTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.36 vs. PRVAX (-1.63). PRVAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.75 vs. FNTAX (-5.58).
| FNTAX | PRVAX | FNTAX / PRVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.55 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.55 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.020 | -2.514 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 1.29B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.35 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.36 | -1.63 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.13 | 4.73 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.58 | -0.75 | 739% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.09 | 11.49 | 105% |