Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs TFBIX
FNTAX vs TFBIX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs TFBIX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.25M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond I
Price$9.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FNTAX vs TFBIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. TFBIX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and TFBIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBIX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FNTAX (69.2M). TFBIX pays higher dividends than FNTAX: TFBIX (3.52) vs FNTAX (3.16). FNTAX was incepted earlier than TFBIX: FNTAX (24 years) vs TFBIX (8 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than TFBIX (0.41). FNTAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. TFBIX (17.30). FNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBIX: FNTAX (2500) vs TFBIX (500000). TFBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.39 vs. FNTAX (-1.21). TFBIX return over 5 years is better than : 3.26 vs. FNTAX (-5.08).
| FNTAX | TFBIX | FNTAX / TFBIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.41 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.41 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.393 | -1.647 | 145% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.2M | 2.27B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | 0.39 | -307% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.08 | 8.52 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | 3.26 | -156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement