Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs TFBVX
FNTAX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs TFBVX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.25M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FNTAX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. TFBVX commentary
Jun 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. FNTAX (69.2M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than FNTAX: TFBVX (3.48) vs FNTAX (3.16). FNTAX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: FNTAX (24 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). FNTAX (20.00) and TFBVX (19.10) have comparable annual turnover. FNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: FNTAX (2500) vs TFBVX (500000). TFBVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.27 vs. FNTAX (-1.21). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : 1.13 vs. FNTAX (-5.08).
| FNTAX | TFBVX | FNTAX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.42 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.42 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.393 | -2.270 | 105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.2M | 1.29B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 3.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -0.27 | 442% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.08 | 7.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.08 | 1.13 | -448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers