Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FNTAX vs TFBVX
FNTAX vs TFBVX Comparison
Open Charts FNTAX vs TFBVX
Nuveen Nebraska Municipal Bond A
Price$9.37
Change-$0.04 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.38M
T. Rowe Price Virginia Tax Free Bond I
Price$10.71
Change-$0.05 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
FNTAX vs TFBVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FNTAX vs. TFBVX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNTAX is a Hold and TFBVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFBVX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. FNTAX (70.4M). TFBVX pays higher dividends than FNTAX: TFBVX (3.48) vs FNTAX (3.17). FNTAX was incepted earlier than TFBVX: FNTAX (24 years) vs TFBVX (8 years). FNTAX (0.92) is less costly to investors than TFBVX (0.42). FNTAX (20.00) and TFBVX (19.10) have comparable annual turnover. FNTAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFBVX: FNTAX (2500) vs TFBVX (500000). FNTAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.36 vs. TFBVX (-1.50). TFBVX return over 5 years is better than : -0.12 vs. FNTAX (-5.58).
| FNTAX | TFBVX | FNTAX / TFBVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.42 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.42 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.020 | -2.446 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.4M | 1.29B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 3.48 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.36 | -1.50 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.13 | 5.22 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.58 | -0.12 | 4,814% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement