FNWB
Price
$8.26
Change
+$0.23 (+2.86%)
Updated
Jul 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
149.01M
9 days until earnings call
TMP
Price
$66.01
Change
-$1.63 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
704.46M
4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FNWB vs TMP

Header iconFNWB vs TMP Comparison
Open Charts FNWB vs TMPBanner chart's image
First Northwest Ban
Price$8.26
Change+$0.23 (+2.86%)
Volume$200
Capitalization149.01M
Tompkins Financial
Price$66.01
Change-$1.63 (-2.41%)
Volume$41.35K
Capitalization704.46M
FNWB vs TMP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWB vs. TMP commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWB is a Hold and TMP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWB: $8.03 vs. TMP: $66.01)
Brand notoriety: FNWB and TMP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWB: 74% vs. TMP: 87%
Market capitalization -- FNWB: $149.01M vs. TMP: $704.46M
FNWB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $149.01M. TMP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $704.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNWB and TMP are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TMP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWB is a better buy in the short-term than TMP.

Price Growth

FNWB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.17% price change this week, while TMP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

TMP is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.61% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMP($704M) has a higher market cap than FNWB($149M). TMP has higher P/E ratio than FNWB: TMP (74.09) vs FNWB (60.69). TMP YTD gains are higher at: -0.839 vs. FNWB (-20.197). TMP has more cash in the bank: 75.4M vs. FNWB (20.6M). FNWB has less debt than TMP: FNWB (321M) vs TMP (602M). TMP has higher revenues than FNWB: TMP (216M) vs FNWB (65.5M).
FNWBTMPFNWB / TMP
Capitalization149M704M21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-20.197-0.8392,408%
P/E Ratio60.6974.0982%
Revenue65.5M216M30%
Total Cash20.6M75.4M27%
Total Debt321M602M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWB vs TMP: Fundamental Ratings
FNWB
TMP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10072
SMR RATING
1..100
8918
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWB's Valuation (30) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMP (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMP’s over the last 12 months.

TMP's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TMP’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

TMP's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWB (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TMP’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

TMP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (83) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that TMP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TMP (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew significantly faster than TMP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWBTMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLCVX73.71-0.31
-0.42%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
NGISX17.37-0.08
-0.46%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core I.S
RSQAX24.64-0.13
-0.52%
Russell Inv Equity Income A
SAGAX58.21-0.59
-1.00%
Virtus Zevenbergen Innovative Gr Stk A
MAADX2.46-0.03
-1.20%
Morgan Stanley Inst Dynamic Value R6

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with OZKAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then OZKAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
+0.31%
OZKAP - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
INDB - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
WTFCP - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ISTR - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
VLYPO - FNWB
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
More

TMP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMP has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMP jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMP
1D Price
Change %
TMP100%
-2.41%
TCBK - TMP
88%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
CBU - TMP
87%
Closely correlated
-2.27%
NWBI - TMP
87%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
UBSI - TMP
86%
Closely correlated
-1.73%
PFS - TMP
86%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
More