FNWD
Price
$27.01
Change
+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
105.75M
3 days until earnings call
FUNC
Price
$32.95
Change
-$0.10 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNWD vs FUNC

Header iconFNWD vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FNWD vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Finward Ban
Price$27.01
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$3.62K
Capitalization105.75M
First United
Price$32.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.30%)
Volume$24.3K
Capitalization152.19M
FNWD vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNWD vs. FUNC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNWD is a Hold and FUNC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FNWD: $27.01 vs. FUNC: $32.95)
Brand notoriety: FNWD and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNWD: 109% vs. FUNC: 94%
Market capitalization -- FNWD: $105.75M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
FNWD [@Regional Banks] is valued at $105.75M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than FNWD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNWD is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FNWD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.60% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNWD is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than FNWD($106M). FNWD has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: FNWD (12.62) vs FUNC (10.14). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: -1.599 vs. FNWD (-3.913). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. FNWD (23.2M). FNWD has less debt than FUNC: FNWD (80M) vs FUNC (112M). FUNC has higher revenues than FNWD: FUNC (71.3M) vs FNWD (65.3M).
FNWDFUNCFNWD / FUNC
Capitalization106M152M70%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.913-1.599245%
P/E Ratio12.6210.14124%
Revenue65.3M71.3M92%
Total Cash23.2M86.9M27%
Total Debt80M112M71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNWD vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FNWD
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5464
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10027
SMR RATING
1..100
5044
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNWD's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNWD (100) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew significantly faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (50) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWD (59) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWD (80) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNWDFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNWD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSRX13.800.10
+0.73%
Cullen Small Cap Value Retail
HILRX17.920.12
+0.67%
Hartford International Value R3
TSMOX15.210.07
+0.46%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq Retirement
MMKBX20.600.08
+0.39%
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts A
ASCRX15.380.06
+0.39%
American Century Small Company R

FNWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNWD and BVFL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNWD and BVFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWD
1D Price
Change %
FNWD100%
+0.04%
BVFL - FNWD
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
FNRN - FNWD
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
ORRF - FNWD
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
FUNC - FNWD
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
SFBS - FNWD
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.37%
EFSC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
SASR - FUNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
NWBI - FUNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
CCNE - FUNC
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
STBA - FUNC
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
More